# The US Shouldn’t Interfere While Putin Loses in Ukraine

- Link: https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2022/02/the-u-s-shouldnt-interfere-while-putin-loses-in-ukraine-2/
- Published: 2022-02-28T14:05:00-05:00

### He has behaved as if he’s blind to the true stakes and likely consequences of the conflict he sought.

### By 󠀁[Mark Hannah](https://egfound.org/about/team/mark-hannah/)󠁿, **Senior Fellow**

**_This article appeared in_ _the_ [Wall Street Journal](https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/russia-s-ukraine-war-foreshadowed-biden-nato-speech-ncna1292539)
[ ](https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-s-shouldnt-interfere-while-putin-loses-in-ukraine-russia-invasion-military-overreach-security-united-nations-11646085681)
_on February_** **_28, 2022._**

---

In his speech announcing the invasion of Ukraine, [Vladimir Putin](https://www.wsj.com/topics/person/vladimir-putin)
referenced the United Nations charter, praised “the high values of human rights 
and freedoms,” and claimed his war represents the only “opportunity to protect Russia
and our people.” This from a man regarded by many American commentators as an archrealist
who makes hardheaded observations about the world as it is and cunningly employs
power to reshape it according to Russia’s interests. In Mike Pompeo’s appraisal,
the Russian president is a “very talented statesman” and “very shrewd.”

In reality, Mr. Putin’s latest war of aggression is motivated by a toxic mix of 
nostalgia and fantasy that seems likely to prove self-destructive. Mr. Putin has
so far behaved like a man blind to the true stakes and probable consequences of 
this conflict. And the U.S., which is currently recovering from its own bout of 
military overreach, has the opportunity to revive a spirit of clear-eyed pragmatism
that has been absent from major national security decisions in recent decades. If
Mr. Putin’s actions are driven by an exaggerated view of his country’s power—and
its insecurity—President Biden’s response must continue to be informed by a realistic
appraisal of the ways the U.S. can (and can’t) defend its security interests and
help the Ukrainian people.

This might seem like common sense, but not everyone sees it that way. Hillary Clinton
recently called the war in Ukraine a “flash point in a larger global struggle between
democracy and autocracy.” It is tempting to frame conflicts like these as existential
struggles between competing political philosophies. Americans will—and should—always
root for democracy. But reducing complex, distant conflicts to simplistic binaries
obscures the actual grievances and motivations of hostile actors.

The notion that Mr. Putin’s invasion poses a threat not only to Ukrainian sovereignty
but to “global democracy” or freedom itself leads some to propose extraordinary 
responses. Evelyn N. Farkas, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense
for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia in the Obama administration, has called for an international
coalition to [enforce](https://twitter.com/EvelynNFarkas/status/1495892708795236356)
a no-fly zone over Ukraine. So far, the Biden administration has prudently ignored
this and other such options, recognizing that America’s interests in Ukraine don’t
justify risking war with a nuclear-armed Russia. Eliot Cohen has [proposed](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/02/putin-russia-invasion-ukraine-war/621182/)
that the U.S. should arm a hypothetical Ukrainian insurgency—which the Biden administration
has reportedly considered—to raise the costs for Russia and deter other nations 
that might be considering malign activities. But Ukraine is a flat country unsuited
to guerrilla warfare. Backing an insurgency could ignite a wider conflict between
the U.S. and Russia, and increase the violence inflicted on Ukrainian civilians.

_Read more of Mark’s article in the _[Wall Street Journal](https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-s-shouldnt-interfere-while-putin-loses-in-ukraine-russia-invasion-military-overreach-security-united-nations-11646085681).

---

[[

## **Written by **󠀁[Mark Hannah](https://egfound.org/about/team/mark-hannah/)󠁿

Mark is a senior fellow with the Independent America project at the Institute for
Global Affairs and host of the podcast, _None Of The Above_.

 * [Twitter](https://twitter.com/ProfessorHannah)
 * [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/markhannah/)

# Read more from Mark

 [⌊Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar speaks to a crowd in NYC.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/americas-iran-war-is-costing-it-india/)

[Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/)

### 󠀁[America’s Iran War Is Costing It India](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/americas-iran-war-is-costing-it-india/)󠁿

 [⌊A man watches footage of a drone.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/the-film-school-grad-on-ukraines-front-line/)

[Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/)

### 󠀁[The Film School Grad on Ukraine’s Front Line](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/the-film-school-grad-on-ukraines-front-line/)󠁿

 [⌊President Trump speaks at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/the-un-doesnt-get-credit-for-the-lives-it-saves/)

[Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/)

### 󠀁[The UN Doesn’t Get Credit for the Lives It Saves](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/the-un-doesnt-get-credit-for-the-lives-it-saves/)󠁿

[Technology](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/technology/)

### 󠀁[Mark Hannah with Dr. Yuh-Jye Lee of Taiwan’s NSC | Concordia Annual Summit](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/mark-hannah-with-dr-yuh-jye-lee/)󠁿

[Politics & Government](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/politics-government/)

### 󠀁[Mark Hannah on Jimmy Kimmel’s Cancellation | MSNBC Interview](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/mark-hannah-on-jimmy-kimmel/)󠁿

 [⌊A seamstress at Chinese factors sews an American flag⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-finale-why-the-90s-matter/)

[Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/)

### 󠀁[’90s Rewind Finale | Why The ‘90s Matter](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-finale-why-the-90s-matter/)󠁿

 [⌊US troops in desert camouflage disembark near a military transport aircraft during a foreign deployment⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-a-military-without-rival/)

[Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/)

### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | A Military Without Rival](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-a-military-without-rival/)󠁿

 [⌊Children run as a US military helicopter hovers low over a road in Somalia⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-the-cost-of-humanitarian-intervention/)

[Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/)

### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | The Cost of Humanitarian Intervention](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-the-cost-of-humanitarian-intervention/)󠁿

 [⌊Chinese President Jiang Zemin and US President Bill Clinton wave during a joint press event in front of Chinese and American flags in 1997⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-americas-china-gamble/)

[Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/)

### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | America’s China Gamble](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-americas-china-gamble/)󠁿
