# Americans Support Biden’s Response to the Ukraine War But Worry About Nuclear Escalation - Link: https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2022/10/americans-support-bidens-response-to-the-ukraine-war-but-worry-about-nuclear-escalation/ - Published: 2022-10-24T20:11:50-04:00 #### **By 󠀁[Mark Hannah](https://egfound.org/about/team/mark-hannah/)󠁿 and 󠀁[Dina Smeltz](https://globalaffairs.org/about/staff/dina-smeltz)󠁿** This article appeared in [_TIME_](https://time.com/6224376/public-supports-bidens-response-to-the-ukraine-war-nuclear-escalation/) on October 24, 2022. It includes references to the Eurasia Group Foundation, now known as the Institute for Global Affairs. --- NATO and Russia will soon [conduct ](https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/15/upcoming-russian-nuclear-exercises-a-challenge-for-the-west.html) their annual nuclear exercises. These otherwise routine drills come at a perilous moment. For the first time since the Cold War, an American president is tested by a major power on how he might respond to a nuclear attack. Thus far, President Biden has aided Ukraine (and pressured wealthy European allies to do likewise) while not directly embroiling the U.S. in the war. But many prominent voices in Washington urge him to do more. After two decades of overly ambitious and unsuccessful military interventions, several serious foreign policy pros yet again call on the U.S. to flex its muscle, to escalate America’s involvement in this conflict. Some urge the U.S. to double down in the face of “ nuclear blackmail,” lest dictators be [emboldened](https://twitter.com/TimothyDSnyder/status/1581004273030086657) and the chances for [nuclear war](https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1582004044557869056) and proliferation increase. Others contend the U.S. should swiftly respond to a Russian nuclear attack with [conventional strikes ](https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/12/military-force-putin-nuclear-threats-00061201) or even tactical nuclear use [of its own](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/05/opinion/putin-nuclear-ukraine.html). The president, however, seems more attentive to the risks of nuclear war. He recently said he doesn’t think Putin is joking, and invoked the prospect of nuclear “Armageddon.” Biden’s more cautious approach has earned him public support and were he to depart from it and bow to the pressure emanating from hawkish enclaves inside the Beltway, he could jeopardize that. This caveat stems from two new national surveys of Americans’ foreign policy views conducted by our organizations, the [Chicago Council on Global Affairs](https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/research?research_type%5B0%5D=22&date=) and the [Institute for Global Affairs](https://egfound.org/2022/10/rethinking-american-strength/#full-report). Survey results show substantially more Americans think the Biden administration  [responded well](https://egfound.org/2022/10/rethinking-american-strength/#Ukraine) to Russia’s invasion than think it did not. The top reason given is how the U.S. strengthened the Ukrainian resistance through military aid. However, the fact that the U.S. avoided a direct confrontation with Russia or that it encouraged NATO to strengthen Europe’s self-defense capability were, together, cited about as frequently. In other words, many support the president’s response because it’s not doing too much, not because it’s doing enough. … Read more of this article in _[TIME](https://time.com/6224376/public-supports-bidens-response-to-the-ukraine-war-nuclear-escalation/)._ --- [[ ### **Written by **󠀁[Mark Hannah](https://egfound.org/about/team/mark-hannah/)󠁿 Mark is a senior fellow with the Independent America project at the Institute for Global Affairs and host of IGA’s podcast, _None Of The Above_. * [Twitter](https://twitter.com/ProfessorHannah) * [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/markhannah/) * [Mail](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2022/10/americans-support-bidens-response-to-the-ukraine-war-but-worry-about-nuclear-escalation/%20info@egfound.org) ![](https://egfound.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/dina-smeltz-2020_2000-1.jpg) ### **Written by 󠀁[Dina Smeltz](https://globalaffairs.org/about/staff/dina-smeltz)󠁿** Dina is a senior fellow on public opinion and foreign policy at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. * [Twitter](https://twitter.com/RoguePollster) # More from Mark [⌊Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar speaks to a crowd in NYC.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/americas-iran-war-is-costing-it-india/) [Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/) ### 󠀁[America’s Iran War Is Costing It India](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/americas-iran-war-is-costing-it-india/)󠁿 [⌊A man watches footage of a drone.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/the-film-school-grad-on-ukraines-front-line/) [Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/) ### 󠀁[The Film School Grad on Ukraine’s Front Line](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/04/the-film-school-grad-on-ukraines-front-line/)󠁿 [⌊President Trump speaks at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly.⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/the-un-doesnt-get-credit-for-the-lives-it-saves/) [Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/) ### 󠀁[The UN Doesn’t Get Credit for the Lives It Saves](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/the-un-doesnt-get-credit-for-the-lives-it-saves/)󠁿 [Technology](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/technology/) ### 󠀁[Mark Hannah with Dr. Yuh-Jye Lee of Taiwan’s NSC | Concordia Annual Summit](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/mark-hannah-with-dr-yuh-jye-lee/)󠁿 [Politics & Government](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/politics-government/) ### 󠀁[Mark Hannah on Jimmy Kimmel’s Cancellation | MSNBC Interview](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/09/mark-hannah-on-jimmy-kimmel/)󠁿 [⌊A seamstress at Chinese factors sews an American flag⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-finale-why-the-90s-matter/) [Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/) ### 󠀁[’90s Rewind Finale | Why The ‘90s Matter](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-finale-why-the-90s-matter/)󠁿 [⌊US troops in desert camouflage disembark near a military transport aircraft during a foreign deployment⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-a-military-without-rival/) [Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/) ### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | A Military Without Rival](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/06/90s-rewind-a-military-without-rival/)󠁿 [⌊Children run as a US military helicopter hovers low over a road in Somalia⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-the-cost-of-humanitarian-intervention/) [Conflict & War](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/conflict-war/) ### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | The Cost of Humanitarian Intervention](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-the-cost-of-humanitarian-intervention/)󠁿 [⌊Chinese President Jiang Zemin and US President Bill Clinton wave during a joint press event in front of Chinese and American flags in 1997⌉](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-americas-china-gamble/) [Diplomacy](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/by-subject/diplomacy/) ### 󠀁[’90s Rewind | America’s China Gamble](https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2025/05/90s-rewind-americas-china-gamble/)󠁿